Binding Energy Estimation with Graded Nanobeam with Density Functional Theory Electromagnetic Wave Scattering Theories
Keywords:
Binding energy, Graded nanobeam, Non-Local Strain Born-Infeld Theory (N-LSBIT)Abstract
Binding energy estimation in graded nanobeams involves understanding the interaction forces at atomic levels, often using advanced methods like Density Functional Theory (DFT). DFT allows precise electronic structure calculations, aiding in determining binding energies by accounting for quantum-mechanical interactions. Binding energy estimation in graded nanobeams is significantly advanced by integrating the proposed Non-Local Strain Born-Infeld Theory (N-LSBIT) with scattering theories. N-LSBIT incorporates non-local effects, capturing the influence of strain gradients and longrange interactions on nanostructure binding energy. Coupled with Density Functional Theory (DFT), this framework allows precise calculation of electronic structures, while scattering theories analyze the interaction of electromagnetic waves with graded nanobeams. Binding energy estimation in graded nanobeams using the proposed Non-Local Strain Born-Infeld Theory (N-LSBIT) combined with scattering theories provides a detailed numerical framework. For example, using Density Functional Theory (DFT), a graded nanobeam with a length of 100 nm and a strain gradient of 10⁷ m⁻¹ may exhibit a binding energy of approximately 2.5 eV per atom. Incorporating N-LSBIT, which accounts for non-local strain effects, this value adjusts to 2.7 eV, highlighting a 10% increase due to long-range interaction contributions. Electromagnetic wave scattering at a wavelength of 500 nm reveals a peak scattering intensity of 1.2 × 10⁶ W/m², indicating strong interaction between wave energy and strain-induced variations in the nanobeam.
References
[1] Seema and A. Singhal, “Theoretical investigation of SH wave transmission in magneto-electroelastic structure having imperfect interface using approximating method,” Applied Physics A, vol.130, no.8, pp.597, 2024.
[2] S. Alkunte, M. Gupta, M. Rajeshirke, N. More, M. Cheepu et al., “Functionally Graded Metamaterials: Fabrication Techniques, Modeling, and Applications—A Review,” Processes, vol.12, no.10, pp.2252, 2024.
[3] Y. Maiza and H. Bourouina, “Non-local response prediction for FGP sandwich microbeam with 2D PSH network subjected to adatoms-substrate interactions and exited by magnetic intensity,” Acta Mechanica, pp.1-30, 2024.
[4] M. Li, P. Huang and H. Zhong, “Current understanding of band-edge properties of halide perovskites: urbach tail, rashba splitting, and exciton binding energy,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, vol.14, no.6, pp.1592-1603, 2023.
[5] B. Zhang, J. Oh, Z. Sun, Y. Cho, S. Jeong et al., “Buried guanidinium passivator with favorable binding energy for perovskite solar cells,” ACS Energy Letters, vol.8, no.4, pp.1848-1856, 2023.
[6] R. K. Mohapatra, A. Mahal, A. Ansari, M. Kumar, J.P. Guru et al., “Comparison of the binding energies of approved mpox drugs and phytochemicals through molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and ADMET studies: An in silico approach,” Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, vol.5, no.3, pp.118-132, 2023.
[7] P. Giuliani, K. Godbey, E. Bonilla, F. Viens and J. Piekarewicz, “Bayes goes fast: Uncertainty quantification for a covariant energy density functional emulated by the reduced basis method,” Frontiers in Physics, vol.10, pp.1054524, 2023.
[8] L.D. Devhare and N. Gokhale, “In silico anti-ulcerative activity evaluation of some bioactive compound from Cassia tora and Butea monosperma through moleculer docking approach,” International journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research, vol.14, no.2, pp.1000-08,2023.
[9] D.G. Park, J.W. Choi, H. Chun, H.S. Jang, H. Lee et al., “Increasing CO binding energy and defects by preserving Cu oxidation state via O2-plasma-assisted N doping on CuO enables high C2+ selectivity and long-term stability in electrochemical CO2 reduction,” ACS Catalysis, vol.13, no.13, pp.9222-9233, 2023.
[10] P. K. Mohapatra, K. S. Chopdar, G. C. Dash, A. K. Mohanty and M.K. Raval, “In silico screening and covalent binding of phytochemicals of Ocimum sanctum against SARS-CoV-2 (COVID 19) main protease,” Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, vol.41, no.2, pp.435-444, 2023.
[11] M. Ali, “Etching of photon energy into binding energy in depositing carbon films at different chamber pressures,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, vol.34, no.15, pp.1209, 2023.
[12] M. Bagnarol, M. Schäfer, B. Bazak and N. Barnea, “Five-body calculation of s-wave n-4He scattering at next-to-leading order pionless effective field theory,” Physics Letters B, vol.844,pp.138078, 2023.
[13] P.S. Bagus, C.J. Nelin and C.R. Brundle, “Chemical significance of x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy binding energy shifts: A Perspective,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol.41, no.6,2023.
[14] D. Pariari, S. Mehta, S. Mandal, A. Mahata, T. Pramanik et al., “Realizing the lowest bandgap and exciton binding energy in a two-dimensional lead halide system,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol.145, no.29, pp.15896-15905, 2023.
[15] M. Schäfer and B. Bazak,“Few-nucleon scattering in pionless effective field theory,” Physical Review C, vol.107, no.6, pp.064001, 2023.
[16] C. M. Rawlins, J. Hofierka, B. Cunningham, C.H. Patterson and D.G. Green, “Many-body theory calculations of positron scattering and annihilation in H 2, N 2, and CH 4,” Physical Review Letters, vol.130, no.26, pp.263001, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Fringe Global Scientific Press publishes all the papers under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) license. Authors have the liberty to replicate and distribute their work. Authors have the ability to use either the whole or a portion of their piece in compilations or other publications that include their own work. Please see the licensing terms for more information on reusing the work.
