Fracture Behavioural Computer – Aided Engineering Model with Self-Learning Grid System

Authors

  • M. Jayalakshmi Professor and Head, Department of ECE, Ravindra College of Engineering for Women, Kurnool, A.P518002, India. Author

Keywords:

Self-Learning Grid System, Hashing Self-Organized Map (HSOM), Fracture Prediction, Material Failure, Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

Abstract

A Fracture Behavioural Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) Model is a sophisticated computational approach designed to simulate and predict the fracture behavior of materials under various loading conditions. By integrating advanced material models with numerical simulation techniques, this CAE model provides valuable insights into crack initiation, propagation, and material failure. The model leverages finite element analysis (FEA) to simulate stress distributions, fracture toughness, and critical crack growth, considering factors such as material heterogeneity, temperature effects, and loading rates. The Proposed Hashing Self-Organized Map (HSOM) introduces an advanced approach to fracture behavioral modeling in a Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) framework, integrating a Self-Learning Grid System for improved prediction and analysis of material fracture under various loading conditions.
The HSOM combines the power of self-organizing maps (SOM) with a hashing algorithm to efficiently organize and process large volumes of data related to fracture mechanics. This method enables the model to learn and adapt in real time, improving its ability to predict crack initiation and propagation by processing input data from previous simulations and experimental results. In the context of a fracture behavioral CAE model, the HSOM algorithm uses a self-learning grid to automatically classify material
behavior based on stress distribution, crack location, and environmental factors. Simulation results for the proposed Hashing Self-Organized Map (HSOM) integrated into a Fracture Behavioural Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) model with a Self-Learning Grid System demonstrate significant improvements in fracture prediction accuracy and computational efficiency. In a simulation of a 500 MPa tensile stress applied to a carbon composite material, the HSOM model accurately predicted fracture initiation at a 0.5 mm defect with a prediction error of only 2% compared to experimental data, while traditional models showed an error of up to 10%. Additionally, the model forecasted crack propagation with a margin of error of just 3% over a 5 mm crack growth distance, compared to the 10% error margin of conventional fracture models. The hashing technique allowed the HSOM to process large datasets with 95% memory optimization, enabling faster simulations without compromising accuracy. In terms of computational efficiency, the HSOM model reduced simulation time by 40%, processing simulations in 30 minutes instead of the usual 50 minutes required by traditional methods.  

References

[1] K. Yan, X. Lin, W. Ma and Y. Zhang, “AI-Based Self-Learning System in Distributed Structural Health Monitoring and Control,” Neural Processing Letters, vol.55, no.1, pp.229-245, 2023.

[2] J. Jithish, B. Alangot, N. Mahalingam and K.S. Yeo, “Distributed anomaly detection in smart grids: a federated learning-based approach,” IEEE Access, vol.11, pp.7157-7179, 2023.

[3] T. Mazhar, H.M. Irfan, I. Haq, I. Ullah, M. Ashraf et al., “Analysis of challenges and solutions of IoT in smart grids using AI and machine learning techniques: A review,” Electronics, vol.12, no.1, 242, 2023.

[4] K. Amara, C. Boudjemila, N. Zenati, O. Djekoune, D. Aklil et al., “AR computer-assisted learning for children with ASD based on hand gesture and voice interaction,” IETE Journal of Research, vol.69, no.12, pp.8659-8675, 2023.

[5] H. Liu, H. Su, L. Sun and D. Dias-da-Costa, “State-of-the-art review on the use of AI-enhanced computational mechanics in geotechnical engineering,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol.57, no.8,pp.196, 2024.

[6] D. Xu, Y. Pan, X. Zhang, W. Dai and Q. Shuai, “Data-driven modelling and evaluation of a batterypack system’s mechanical safety against bottom cone impact,” Energy, vol.290, pp.130145, 2024.

[7] S. Liang, B. Xu and Y. Zhang, “Robust self-learning fault-tolerant control for hypersonic flight vehicle based on ADHDP,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol.53, no.9, pp.5295-5306, 2023.

[8] S. Yuwono and A. Schwung, “A Model-Based Deep Learning Approach for Self-Learning in Smart Production Systems,” In 2023 IEEE 28th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Sinaia, Romania, pp. 1-8, 2023.

[9] K. Shimatani and H.Yamamoto, “Behavior Estimation System for Elderly Individuals based on 3D LiDAR and Self-Learning Function,” In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 1-4, 2024.

[10] S.D. Gangula, T.K. Nizami, R.R. Udumula and A. Chakravarty, “Self-learning Controller Design for DC–DC Power Converters with Enhanced Dynamic Performance,” Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, pp.1-16, 2024.

[11] H. Fang, Y. Tu, S. He, H. Wang, C. Sun et al., “Self-Learning Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Control With Application to Semicar Active Suspension Model,” IEEE transactions on fuzzy systems, vol.32, no.1, pp.64-74, 2023.

[12] P. Xue and Y. Zhao, “A self-learning channel modeling approach based on explainable neural network,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol.12, no.7, pp.1289-1293, 2023.

[13] F. Yan, C. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Shen and C. Yang, “SENGraph: A Self-Learning Evolutionary and Node-Aware Graph Network for Soft Sensing in Industrial Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024.

[14] S. Yuwono, M. Löppenberg, D. Schwung and A.Schwung, “Gradient-based Learning in State-based Potential Games for Self-Learning Production Systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10015, 2024.

[15] H. H. M. Al-Fatlawi, Q. M. Khayoon, A. J. Albhadly and A. K. Ibrahim, “AI-enhanced demand response strategies in smart grids: toward sustainable energy future,” Journal of Electrical Systems, vol.20, no.7s, pp.1054-1064, 2024.

[16] Y. Wan, Q. Xu and T. Dragičević, “Safety-Enhanced Self-Learning for Optimal Power Converter Control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol.71, no.11, 2024.

[17] X. D. Chen, R. He and X. Mao, “SLIM: A transparent structurized self-learning interpolation method for super-resolution images,” The Visual Computer, vol.40, no.4, pp.2857-2872, 2024.

[18] P. Kumar, S.R. Arya and R. Bosu, “Impementation of Self-Learning ANN-ANFIS Based Dynamic Voltage Restorer for Voltage Power Quality Improvement,” In 2024 International Conference on Computer, Electrical and Communication Engineering (ICCECE), Kolkata, India, pp. 1-9, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Fracture Behavioural Computer – Aided Engineering Model with Self-Learning Grid System. (2024). Journal of Electronics and Power Engineering (JEPE) , 1(1), 51-61. https://fringeglobal.com/ojs/index.php/jepe/article/view/fracture-behavioural-computer-aided-engineering-model-with-selfl