Artificial Intelligence Supported Anti-Money Laundering Detection Through Multi-Scale Temporal Encoder and Graph Representation Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69996/jcai.2026012Keywords:
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Graph Representation Learning (GRL), Anti-Money Laundering Detection, Receptive Field and DilationAbstract
A layered-screening mechanism via Trade-based money laundering (TBML) targets money laundering by improving anomaly detection in high transaction volumes and adapting to evolving criminal methods, addressing limitations of current deep learning techniques with sparse data. To overcome these issues a new framework has developed AI with Multi-Scale Temporal Encoder and Graph Representation Learning (AMTEGR). Real-time fraud detection in supply chain transactions requires precision. The dataset has 180,000 transactions, 3% of which are fraudulent. A multi-scale temporal encoder with TCNs uses a multi-branch convolutional architecture and kernel sizes of 4, 8, and 14 to capture dependencies at different time scales: intra-day patterns, local transaction patterns, and recurring transactions. Receptive field and dilation are employed to improve long-range temporal dependency capture. Attention-based feature refinement employs a multi-head attention mechanism to identify key feature associations in transactions and enhance representations through normalization, input fusion, and residual connections. Graph Representation Learning (GRL) nodes representing transactions, customers, orders, and products are interconnected through a graph, enabling a model to understand complex supply-chain and financial interactions. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for AML Detection for temporal and graph representations are applied in a convolutional network to identify suspicious and fraudulent transaction patterns. The performance analysis is training scalability, inference scalability, F1-Score Vs threshold value calculations.
References
[1] S. Paul, “Macro–meso–micro analytics for trade-based money laundering risk screening in Bangladesh: A conceptual entity-graph extension,” Journal of Economic Criminology, vol. 9, 2026.
[2] B. Oztas, D. Cetinkaya, F. Adedoyin, M. Budka, G. Aksu and H. Dogan, “Transaction monitoring in anti-money laundering: A qualitative analysis and points of view from industry,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 159, pp. 161–171, 2024.
[3] C. Jiang, Y. Luo and Z. Zhou, “Multi-scale temporal modeling for financial fraud detection using variational autoencoders,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 142, pp. 114–124, 2026.
[4] Y. Chen, C. Zhao, Y. Xu, C. Nie and Y. Zhang, “Deep learning in financial fraud detection: Innovations, challenges, and applications,” Data Science and Management, vol. 9, no. 2, 2026.
[5] L. Tamym, Y. Amadiaz, M. Bahbib and A. Nait-Sidi-Moh, “A heterogeneous graph representation learning approach for fraud detection in supply chain networks,” Intelligent Systems with Applications, vol. 31, 2026.
[6] L. Wang, “MH-DRNN: An intelligent approach in financial fraud detection and prevention,” Systems and Soft Computing, 2026.
[7] K. B. Matabane, S. A. Ajagbe, I. N. Ezeji and M. O. Adigun, “Analyzing the impact of integrating explainable artificial intelligence on machine learning models for fraud detection,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 283, pp. 4623–4632, 2026.
[8] M. Hasan, M. S. Rahman, M. J. M. Chowdhury and I. H. Sarker, “CNN based deep learning modeling with explainability analysis for detecting fraudulent blockchain transactions,” Cyber Security and Applications, vol. 3, 2025.
[9] M. Hasan, M. R. I. Tomal and M. P. Uddin, “Interpretable federated learning for fraud detection in non-IID blockchain transactions,” Blockchain: Research and Applications, 2026.
[10] G. Murugaraj, R. Krishnan, L. Harikrishnan and M. S. Kandasamy, “Systematic review on the influence of classical and quantum machine learning in the financial sector,” Data Science and Management, 2026.
[11] H. Huo, “Design and empirical analysis of financial fraud detection algorithms based on blockchain and artificial intelligence,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 281, pp. 264–271, 2026.
[12] F. Zola, L. Muñoz, A. Venturi and A. Gil, “Synthetic pattern generation and detection of financial activities using graph autoencoders,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 280, pp. 1247–1253, 2026.
[13] Erugu Saidulu and S. Rajender, “Securing Banking Transactions with Blockchain: A Tokenless Approach,” FMEP, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 78–92, 2025.
[14] Pathepuram Mamatha, Majhi Sneha, Thumkunta Ashray Reddy, Danthuri Chandrakanth and V. Shiva Narayana Reddy, “Secure Sharing of Identity (KYC),” FMEP, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 93–106, 2025.
[15] C. O. Kungu, K. Senagi and E. Omondi, “Hybrid deep learning for anti-money laundering: Unsupervised detection of emerging schemes via feature fusion and explainable artificial intelligence,” Machine Learning with Applications, vol. 23, 2026.
[16] M. E. Lokanan, “Accounting scripts and the politics of compliance: Understanding accountants’ roles in anti-money laundering through sentiment and script theory,” Journal of Economic Criminology, vol. 11, 2026.
[17] K. Boudt, O. Delmarcelle and P. Ringoot, “A news monitoring system to detect relevant news for the anti-money laundering supervision of financial institutions,” Risk Sciences, vol. 1, 2025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Computer Allied Intelligence(JCAI, ISSN: 2584-2676)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Fringe Global Scientific Press publishes all the papers under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) license. Authors have the liberty to replicate and distribute their work. Authors have the ability to use either the whole or a portion of their piece in compilations or other publications that include their own work. Please see the licensing terms for more information on reusing the work.

