From Pixels to Provenance: Harnessing Source Camera Fingerprints to Detect AI-Created Images

Authors

  • Patnala Naga Satya Sesha Venkata Charishma Student, VSM College Of Engineering (A), Ramachandrapuram , Dr.B.R.Ambhedkar Konaseema Dt , Andhra Pradesh ,India – 533255.
  • N S C Mohana Rao Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering , VSM College Of Engineering (A) , Ramachandrapuram , Dr.B.R.Ambhedkar Konaseema Dt , Andhra Pradesh ,India - 533255

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69996/jsihs.2026006

Keywords:

Digital Forensics, Journalism, Legal Evidence Verification, Photo-Response Non-Uniformity

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence has led to the widespread creation of highly realistic synthetic images, posing significant challenges to image authenticity, digital trust, and misinformation detection. Traditional visual inspection and content-based forensic techniques are increasingly inadequate in distinguishing AI-generated images from those captured by real-world cameras. This study presents a robust forensic framework that leverages source camera fingerprints to detect AIcreated images by analyzing intrinsic device-level artifacts embedded during the image formation process. By extracting and modeling sensor-specific patterns such as Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) and noise residuals, the proposed approach differentiates between images originating from physical imaging sensors and those synthesized by generative models. The framework integrates signal processing techniques with machine learning classifiers to evaluate provenance authenticity at the pixel level. Experimental results demonstrate that camera fingerprint–based analysis significantly improves detection accuracy, even for visually convincing AI-generated images and post-processed content. The findings highlight the effectiveness of provenance-aware forensics in combating deepfake imagery and reinforcing trust in digital media ecosystems. This work contributes toward the development of reliable image authentication systems essential for digital forensics, journalism, legal evidence verification, and secure multimedia communication.

References

[1] J. Lukas, J. Fridrich, and M. Goljan, “Digital camera identification from sensor pattern noise,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 205– 214, 2006.

[2] M. Chen, J. Fridrich, M. Goljan, and J. Lukas, “Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 74–90, 2008.

[3] H. Farid, “Image forgery detection: A survey,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 16–25, 2009.

[4] A. Swaminathan, M. Wu, and K. J. R. Liu, “Digital image forensics via intrinsic fingerprints,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 101–117, 2008.

[5] J. Fridrich, “Digital image forensics,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 26–37, 2009.

[6]

[6] I. Goodfellow, “Generative adversarial networks,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 139–144, 2020.

[7] A. Rössler, “FaceForensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images,” IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 1–11, 2019.

[8] D. Cozzolino and L. Verdoliva, “Noiseprint: A CNN-based camera model fingerprint,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 15, pp. 144–159, 2020.

[9] S. Wang, O. Wang, R. Zhang, A. Owens, and A. A. Efros, “CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot… for now,” IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 8695–8704, 2020.

[10]

[10] Y. Zhang, F. Ding, and S. Kwong, “Detecting AI-synthesized images using noise inconsistencies,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 126453–126463, 2021.

[11] T. Karras, “Analyzing and improving the image quality of StyleGAN,” IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 8107–8116, 2020.

[12] X. Liu, Y. Wu, and W. Zeng, “Robust detection of GAN-generated images using frequency domain analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 24, pp. 1231–1243, 2022.

[13] C. Guera and E. J. Delp, “Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks,” IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), pp. 1–6, 2018.

[14] F. Marra, D. Gragnaniello, D. Cozzolino, and L. Verdoliva, “Detection of GANgenerated fake images over social networks,” IEEE Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR), pp. 384–389, 2018.

[15] N. Yu, L. Davis, and M. Fritz, “Attributing fake images to GANs: Learning and analyzing GAN fingerprints,” IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 7556–7566, 2019

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Patnala Naga Satya Sesha Venkata Charishma, & N S C Mohana Rao. (2026). From Pixels to Provenance: Harnessing Source Camera Fingerprints to Detect AI-Created Images. Journal of Sensors, IoT & Health Sciences (JSIHS,ISSN: 2584-2560), 4(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.69996/jsihs.2026006