Genetic Transformation in Cucumber as Influenced by Inoculation Time and CoCultivation Period

Authors

  • S. M. Faisal Principal Scientific Officer, BARI, Ramgarh, Khagrachari hill district, Bangladesh Author
  • M. S. Haque Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, BAU, Mymensingh-2202, Irrigation and Water Management Division, BARI, Joydevpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh. Author
  • K. M. Nasiruddin Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, BAU, Mymensingh-2202, Irrigation and Water Management Division, BARI, Joydevpur, Gazipur-1701, Bangladesh. Author
  • N. F. Rownok BSAg Student, IUBAT, Sector-10, Dhaka-1230, Bangladesh. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69996/ijari.2024020

Keywords:

genetic transformation, cucumber, abiotic stress

Abstract

The LBA4404 strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens was utilized to assess the impact of inoculation time and co-cultivation period on the genetic transformation of cucumber (var. Shital) for abiotic stress tolerance. This strain carries the CIPK sense gene. The transformation was performed on the leaf, nodal, and internodal calli. Histochemical analysis of GUS reporter gene expression in viable calli samples allowed for evaluation of transformation capacity. In the callus tissue, there was a noticeable patch that was positive for GUS (blue in color). In this inquiry, three things were considered. A total of three different kinds of explants—leaf, nodal, and internodal callus—made up factor A. Factor B included inoculation times of three and five minutes, respectively. Factor C included co-cultivation times of twenty-four and forty-eight hours. The number of calluses that tested positive for GUS (3.17% and 52.87%, respectively) increased with increasing immersion time in the bacterial suspension (from 3 to 5 minutes), while the number of calluses that tested negative for GUS decreased (2.15 and 34.88%, respectively) with decreasing immersion time.More time spent co-cultivating (48 hours) resulted in superior performance compared to a shorter period. After two days of co-cultivation (48 hours), a greater number of calluses (12.45%) and a higher proportion of calluses (51.87%), respectively, survived. After immersing leaf explants in an Agrobacterium suspension for 5 minutes and then transferring them to co-cultivation media for 48 hours, the maximum number of GUS +ve callus (4.04 and 67.38%, respectively) were achieved.

References

1. BBS. Statistical pocket book of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of statistics, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 209, 2008.

2. BBS. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of statistics, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. 34, 97, November, 2005.

3. BBS. Monthly statistical bulletin-Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of statistics, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 55, June, 2006.

4. S. N. Begam, “Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of potato for abiotic stress tolerance,” MS thesis.Dept. of Biotechnology.Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 17-50, 2007.

5. H. S. Chawla, “Introduction to Plant Biotechnology,” Oxford & IBH publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., 66 Janapath, New Delhi 110001, India, 40-42, 2002. G. Fang and R. Grumet, “Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation and regeneration of muskmelon plants,” Plant Cell Reports, 9, 1990, 160-164.

6. R. C. Gardner, “Gene transfer into tropical and subtropical crops,” Scientia Hort, 55, 1993, 65-82. 7. R. A. Jefferson, T. A. Kavanagh and M. W. Bevan, “GUS Fusion: β- glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants,” J. EMBO, 6, 1986, 3901-3907.

8. D. Rachmawati and H. Anzai, “Studies on the callus induction, plant regeneration and transformation of Javanica rice cultivars,” Plant Biotechnology, 23, 2006, 521-524.

9. S. Mahajan and N. Tuteja, “Direct submission J. plant molecular Biol. I. C. G. E. B., New Delhi 110067, India, 2005.

10. T. Murashigeand and F. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures,” Physiol. Plant, 15, 1962, 473-497.

11. S. Nishibayashi, H. Kaneko and T. Hayakawa, “Transformation of cucumber (Cucumissativus L.) plants using Agrobacteriumtumefaciensand regeneration from hypocotyl explants,” Plant Cell Reports, 15, 1996, 809-814.

12. I. L. Nonnecki, “Vegetable Production..An AVI book,” Van Nostrand Reinhold, 115 Fifth Avenue, New York 10003, USA, 1989, 509-526.

13. L. C. Peirce, “Vegetables: characteristics, production and marketing,” John Wiley and Sons, USA, 1987, 357-366.

14. P. A. Rajagopalan and R. Perl, “Treves.Improved cucumber transformation by a modified explant dissection and selection protocol,” Hort. Science, 40 (2), 2005, 431-435.

15. R. H. Sarker, A. Biswas, B. M. Mustafa, S. Mahbub and M.I. Hoque, “Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of lentil (Lens culinarisMedik.),” Plant Tissue Cult, 13(1), 2003, 1-12.

16. W. B. Wang and A. Altman, “Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance,” Intl. J. Plant. Biol, 218, 2003, 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-23

Issue

Section

Early Access Articles

How to Cite

S. M. Faisal, M. S. Haque, K. M. Nasiruddin, & N. F. Rownok. (2024). Genetic Transformation in Cucumber as Influenced by Inoculation Time and CoCultivation Period. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation(IJARI, 2347-3258), 12(3), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.69996/ijari.2024020