Enviro-cost analysis of PCM incorporated ETC integrated solar still under forced mode

Authors

  • Aseem Dubey Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi-110042, India
  • Akhilesh Arora Department of Mechanical Engineering, Delhi Technological University, Delhi-110042, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51976/v7dwah42

Keywords:

Active solar still, Phase change material, Cost analysis, Carbon credit, Payback time.

Abstract

The potable water can be produced most economically from saline/brackish water using solar still. The productivity can be further enhanced by increasing the basin water temperature and storing the dissipated thermal energy from the solar still by using energy storage materials for re-utilization at night.  In the present study, considering the environmental revenue earned, an economic analysis of the viability of a single slope solar integrated with an evacuated tube collector (ETC) and paraffin wax (PCM) has been carried out.  The ETC integrated solar still increased the yield by ~30.0% when paraffin wax was incorporated compared to the system without PCM, yielding annually to 1683 kg/m2. The net CO2 mitigation, considering the 20 years life of the system, has been found to be 31.5 tons with a net annual environmental cash flow return of Rs. 1325. With the increase in the system’s life from 10-20 years, the cost of distillate decreased from Rs. 1.28 to Rs. 0.31 per liter at a 2% interest rate considering carbon credit. The payback period has been found in the range of 1.5-17.4 years for a system life of 10 and 20 years, respectively, at an interest rate range of 2-10%, and if distillate is sold at a selling rate from      Rs. 10.0-2.0/kg. The production cost from the present system is in the acceptable range compared to other designs with PCM.

References

[1] M. Thimmaraju, D. Sreepada, G.S. Babu, B.K. Dasari, S.K. Velpula, N. Vallepu, Desalination of water, in: Desalination Water Treatment 2018, 333–347.

[2] Prabhakant, G. N. Tiwari, Evaluation of carbon credits earned by energy security in India, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies (2009), 1-10.

[3] S. Kumar, G.N. Tiwari, Life cycle cost analysis of single slope hybrid (PVT) active solar still, Applied Energy 86 (2009) 1995–2004.

[4] S. Kumar, A. Dubey, G.N. Tiwari, A solar still augmented with an evacuated tube collector in forced mode, Desalination 347 (2014) 15–24.

[5] S.W. Sharshir, A.H. Elsheikh, E. Edreis, M.K.A. Ali, R. Sathyamurthy, A. Kabeel, J. Zang, N.J.D.W.T. Yang, Improving the solar still performance by using thermal energy storage materials: A review of recent developments. Desalination and Water Treatment 165 (2019) 1–15.

[6] A. Dubey, A. Arora, Effect of various energy storage phase change materials (PCMs) and nano-enhanced PCMs on the performance of solar stills: A review. Journal of Energy Storage 97 (2024) 112938.

[7] A.E. Kabeel, M. Abdelgaied, Improving the performance of solar still by using PCM as a thermal storage medium under Egyptian conditions, Desalination 383 (2016) 22–28.

[8] H.E.S. Fath, M. El-Samanoudy, K. Fahmy, A. Hassabou, Thermal-economic analysis and comparison between pyramid shaped and single-slope solar still configurations, Desalination 159 (2003) 69-79.

[9] S.M. Shalaby, E.E. Bialy, A.A.E. Sebaii, An experimental investigation of a v-corrugated absorber single-basin solar still using PCM, Desalination 398 (2016) 247–255.

[10] V.K. Sonker, J.P. Chakraborty, A. Sarkar, Development of a frugal solar still using phase change material and nanoparticles integrated with commercialization through a novel economic model, Journal of Energy Storage 51 (2022) 104569.

[11] M. Elashmawy, M. Alhadri, M.M.Z. Ahmed, Enhancing tubular solar still performance using novel PCM-tubes, Desalination 500 (2021) 114880.

[12] A. Hemmatian, H. Kargarsharifabad, A.A. Esfahlani, N. Rahbar, S. Shoeibi, Improving solar still performance with heat pipe/pulsating heat pipe evacuated tube solar collectors and PCM: An experimental and environmental analysis, Solar Energy 269 (2024) 112371.

[13] M. Watt, A. Johnson, M. Ellis, H. Outhred, Life cycle air emission from PV power systems. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications 6 (1998) 127–137.

[14] S. Kumar, K.T. Kurmaji, Carbon credit earned by some designs of solar stills, Desalination and Water Treatment 51 (2013) 4699-4708.

[15] P. Shankar, A. Dubey, S. Kumar, G.N. Tiwari, Production of clean water using ETC integrated solar stills: thermo enviro-economic assessment, Desalination and Water Treatment 218 (2021) 106–118.

[16] M.S. Yousef, H. Hassan, Energetic and exergetic performance assessment of the inclusion of phase change materials (PCM) in a solar distillation system, Energy Conversion and Management 179 (2019) 349–361.

Published

2025-04-10

Issue

Section

Early Access Articles

How to Cite

Aseem Dubey, & Akhilesh Arora. (2025). Enviro-cost analysis of PCM incorporated ETC integrated solar still under forced mode. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation(IJARI, 2347-3258), 13(01). https://doi.org/10.51976/v7dwah42