A Principal Component Analysis Algorithm for Seed Enterprise Financial Performance and Scientific and Technological Innovation

P. Brundavani

doi:10.69996/jcai.2024010

Authors

P. Brundavani Associate Professor, Department of ECE, Ramireddy Subbaramireddy Engineering College Kavali, SPSR Nellore, A.P, 524142, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69996/jcai.2024010

Keywords:

Technological Assessment, principal component analysis (PCA), probabilistic model, deep learning, statistical features

Abstract

The correlation between scientific and technological innovation and the financial performance of seed enterprises is a critical area of study in the realm of entrepreneurship and innovation management. Moreover, innovations in seed technology can enhance product quality, yield, and resilience, thereby influencing customer satisfaction and brand reputation. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) algorithm is a fundamental technique used in data analysis and dimensionality reduction. This study investigates the correlation between scientific and technological innovation and the financial performance of seed enterprises, employing the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) algorithm for performance evaluation. By analyzing a comprehensive dataset encompassing R&D investments, technological advancements, and financial metrics of seed enterprises, the study aims to uncover underlying patterns and relationships. Additionally, the Principal Component Statistical Probabilistic Network (PCA-SPN) model is utilized to further explore the complex interactions between innovation factors and financial performance indicators. Through this integrated approach, the research seeks to provide valuable insights into the drivers of financial success in the seed industry, offering actionable recommendations for enhancing innovation strategies and maximizing financial outcomes. The study demonstrated that R&D investment levels are positively correlated with revenue growth, with an average annual growth rate of 12% observed in enterprises with high R&D expenditure (exceeding $500,000 annually). Additionally, technological advancements, quantified by patent filings and adoption rates of innovative seed varieties, exhibit a strong positive association with profitability metrics, such as gross margin percentages. For instance, seed enterprises introducing patented varieties experienced an average increase of 20% in gross margins compared to non-patenting counterparts

References

[1] M. Greenacre, P. J. Groenen, T. Hastie, A. I. d’Enza, A. Markos et al., “Principal component analysis,” Nature Reviews Methods Primers, vol. 2, no.1, pp. 100, 2022.

[2] A. Capatina, D. S. Cristea, A. Micu, A. E. Micu, G. Empoli et al., ”Exploring causal recipes of startup acceptance into business incubators: a cross-country study,” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 2023.

[3] J. C. Macuácua, J. A.S. Centeno and C. Amisse,”Data mining approach for dry bean seeds classification,” Smart Agricultural Technology, vol. 5, pp. 100240, 2023.

[4] N. T. Viet and A. G. Kravets, “The new method for analyzing technology trends of smart energy asset performance management,” Energies, vol. 15, no.18, pp. 6613, 2022.

[5] M. Tanaka-Yamawaki and Y. Ikura,” Principal component analysis and randomness test for big data analysis: practical applications of RMT-based technique,” Springer Nature, vol. 25, 2023.

[6] Z. Bao and C.Wang, “A multi-agent knowledge integration process for enterprise management innovation from the perspective of neural network,” Information Processing & Management,vol. 59, no. 2, pp.102873, 2022.

[7] S. Ebrahimi, M. Kazerooni, V. Sumati and A. R. Fayek, “Predictive model for construction labour productivity using hybrid feature selection and principal component analysis,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1366-1378, 2022.

[8] H. Yang and L. Wang, “Influence of Enterprise Culture Construction on Technological Innovation Ability Based on Deep Learning,” Mobile Information Systems, pp. 1-12, 2022.

[9] A. S. Zamani, L. Anand, K. P. Rane, P. Prabhu, A. M. Buttar et al., “Performance of machine learning and image processing in plant leaf disease detection,” Journal of Food Quality, pp. 1-7,2022.

[10] J. Wang, W. Rong, Z. Zhang and D. Mei, “Credit Debt Default Risk Assessment Based on theXGBoost Algorithm: An Empirical Study from China,” Wireless Communications and Mobile computing, 2022.

[11] P. Apell and H. Eriksson, “Artificial intelligence (AI) healthcare technology innovations: thecurrent state and challenges from a life science industry perspective,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 179-193, 2023.

[12] N. T. Duc, A. Ramlal, A. Rajendran, D. Raju, S. K. Lal et al., “ Image-based phenotyping of seed architectural traits and prediction of seed weight using machine learning models in soybean,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 14, pp. 1206357, 2023.

[13] H. Z. H. Alsharif and T. Shu, “Research on food safety information training system based on component algorithm,” Food Science and Technology, vol. 42, 2022.

[14] S. Makosso-Kallyth and E. Diday, “Principal Component Analysis of Distributional Data,” Analysis of Distributional Data; Chapman and Hall/CRC: London, UK, pp. 205-246, 2022.

[15] J. M. Soares, A. D. D. Medeiros, D. T. Pinheiro, J. T. F. Rosas, L. J. D. Silva et al., “Low-cost system for multispectral image acquisition and its applicability to analysis of the physiological potential of soybean seeds,” Acta Scientiarum, Agronomy, vol. 45, 2023.

[16] Y. Yin, J. Li, C. Ling, S. Zhang, C. Liu et al., “Fusing spectral and image information for characterization of black tea grade based on hyperspectral technology,” LWT, vol. 185, pp. 115150, 2023.

[17] S. C. Chae and S. Y. Choi, “Analysis of the Term Structure of Major Currencies Using Principal Component Analysis and Autoencoders,” Axioms, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 135, 2022.

[18] Z. Jia, M. Sun, C. Ou, S. Sun, C. Mao et al., “Single seed identification in three Medicago species via multispectral imaging combined with stacking ensemble learning,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 7521, 2022.

[19] Y. Fan, D. Ding and H. Qin, “Research on the Evaluation Method of Enterprises’ Independent Innovation Ability Based on Improved BP Neural Network and DQN Algorithm,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022.

[20] C. Gao, Q. Wu, M. Dyck, J. Lv and H. He, “Greenhouse area detection in Guanzhong Plain, Shaanxi, China: spatio-temporal change and suitability classification,” International Journal of Digital Earth, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 226-248, 2022.

[21] C. Ma, R. U. Awan, D. Ren, M. Alharthi, J. Haider et al., “The IFRS adoption, accounting quality, and banking performance: An evaluation of susceptibilities and financial stability in developing economies,” PloS one, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. e0265688, 2022.

[22] A. M. Ikotun, A. E. Ezugwu, L. Abualigah, B. Abuhaija, and J. Heming, “K-means clustering algorithms: A comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data,” Information Sciences, vol. 622, pp. 178-210, 2023.

[23] I. Niftiyev and G. Ibadoghlu, “Longitudinal Principal Component and Cluster Analysis of Azerbaijan’s Agricultural Productivity in Crop Commodities,” Commodities, vol. 2, no. 2, pp.147-167, 2023.

[24] Y. Kyrylov, V. Hranovska, H. Zhosan and I. Dotsenko, “Innovative Development of Agrarian Enterprises of Ukraine in the Context of the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” In AIP conference proceedings , AIP Publishing, vol. 2413, no. 1, 2022.

[25] D. Yu and Z. Yan, “Combining machine learning and main path analysis to identify research front: from the perspective of science-technology linkage,” Scientometrics, vol. 127, no. 7, pp.4251-4274, 2022.